Boxing people into
stereotypes has been
on a decline in a
huge way, thankfully!
Brave people have
fought for the
right not to be put
in the proverbial,
stereotypical boxes.
Jewellery is a means
of self-expression,
so it is only natural
that so many people
wear, use, and enjoy
jewellery to express
their style and make
statements about
themselves, even
politically
Peggy Grosz, Senior
Vice President,
Assael IncAmidst millennials and Gen-Z folks, the traditional sense of masculinity
is subverted by a new idea of masculinity that makes space for
ambiguity and self-expression. A beautifully crafted piece of jewellery
remains in the sanctum of its creator, unperturbed by the notions
of social constructs, till the time it is marketed with labels. But with
more designers like Gucci’s Alessandra Michele blazoning a fashion
movement that is beyond gender, jewellery is increasingly worn purely
based on its aesthetic appeal and its ability to reflect one’s own personal
sense of style says Vijetha Rangabashyam
If we look at the history of jewellery
and ornamentation, adorning
a piece of jewel was never a
gendered practice. From cavemen
wearing jewellery carved out of shells,
stones and bones, the noble men of the
medieval times adorning themselves
with gold, silver and precious
gemstones to showcase their power and
status, to the period of Renaissance
followed by the next few decades, till
the 19th century, men had as much
an affinity towards wearing jewellery
as women. India is a great example –
though spoken about very often, one
cannot simply omit the case of the
Patiala necklace, commissioned by
the Maharaja of Patiala from Cartier.
The Patiala necklace is neither the
only piece of ornament the Maharaja is
known for commissioning nor is he the
only Indian Prince of his times to have
had this voracious appetite for precious
jewellery.
With industrialisation, somewhere
along the line, the act of wearing jewellery became “feminine”. Men
began to view accessorising from
a more practical lens, and hence
wristwatches, tie pins and cufflinks
became staple accessories for them.
Since then, we’ve seen men playing
peek-a-boo with jewellery instigated
by the cultural changes brought forth
by rock-n-roll, punk, hip-hop, grunge
and such other movements. However,
it is not until recently that a greater
number of men are not just comfortable
wearing gender-fluid jewellery, but are also wearing it to not just make a style
statement but a strong political one too!
The socio-economic-cultural
trifecta
In the realm of high jewellery, the
likes of Boucheron, Tiffany & Co,
Cartier, and Louis Vuitton have all
launched collections that are either
gender-fluid or specific to men. What
has given birth to this ‘resurgence’?
Katerina Perez, Editor-in-Chief of
KaterinaPerez.com, believes that rather
than calling it resurgence, we must
put men’s jewellery in context. “The
landscape of masculinity is changing
and as more celebrities tap into their
individualism, we have seen a steady
increase in men wearing fine jewellery
on the red carpet, including Harry
Styles, Shawn Mendes and Timothée
Chalamet. Gender fluidity has also
played a role in the diversification of
jewellery, helping to shift perceptions
and ‘unlock’ the styling potential of
jewels typically designed for women,” says Katerina.
Tiffany’s recent ‘About Love’
campaign, featuring both Jay-Z and
Beyoncé, where she is seen wearing a
whopping 128.54-carat yellow diamond
necklace, with a rarely seen Jean-
Michel Basquiat painting “Equals
Pi” at the backdrop, says a lot for
luxury brands wanting to capitalise
on the market for men’s jewellery.
“What influence will this have on the
men’s diamond jewellery market, for
example? I expect to see an increase in
demand for men’s engagement rings as
a direct result of this campaign,” adds
Perez.